Let’s get this out of the way first: Patton’s Gap reads like a wartime thriller. Rohmer’s recon pilot perspective adds visceral energy—dogfights, flak explosions, and narrow escapes make you feel the G-forces. But here’s the rub: it’s also a book with an identity crisis.

The Good: The analysis of the Falaise Gap blunder is razor-sharp. Rohmer nails Montgomery’s role in the ‘halt order’ with receipts—seven credible sources, including damning quotes from Bradley’s aides and British officers. The political tension between allies? Chef’s kiss. You can practically smell the ego clashes in SHAEF headquarters.

The Annoying: Random detours into Mulberry Harbours and other off-topic WWII trivia feel like textbook padding. I kept thinking, ‘Stay in your lane, Rohmer!’ His pilot anecdotes are gripping but sometimes derail the core narrative about command failures.

Who’ll Love It: Military history buffs craving fresh dirt on Montgomery (finally, someone calls him out!). The aerial combat scenes are pure adrenaline—perfect for Band of Brothers fans who want cockpit-level action.

Who’ll Hate It: Readers wanting tight focus. The book juggles memoir, tactical analysis, and tangential history lessons. A ruthless editor could’ve made this 5 stars.

Verdict: Flawed but essential. Rohmer takes heat for ‘Montgomery bashing,’ but his evidence sticks. Just skim the filler chapters.